1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 731 A.2d
  5. 731 A.2d 220 (1999)
 

FEIGLEY v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

731 A.2d 220 (1999)

George FEIGLEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided May 11, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Feigley, pro se, petitioner.

Mark E. Guzzi, Camp Hill, for respondent, Dept. of Corrections.

Michael A. Farnan, Harrisburg, for respondent, Atty. Gen.

Before DOYLE, J., PELLEGRINI, J., and McCLOSKEY, Senior Judge.

McCLOSKEY, Senior Judge.

Presently before this Court are the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer filed by the Department of Corrections (DOC) and the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer filed by the Office of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania (OAG) in response to a pro se petition for review filed by George Feigley (Petitioner), seeking relief in mandamus. We hereby grant the demurrer of DOC and OAG.

Petitioner states...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases