AIKEN v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE

No. 97-6371.

190 F.3d 753 (1999)

William Russell AIKEN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, Tennessee, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided September 7, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Aitchison (argued), Aitchison & Vick, Portland, Oregon, Edwin Dean White III (briefed), Farris, Mathews, Branan & Hellen, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellants.

Louis P. Britt III (argued and briefed), McKnight, Hudson, Ford & Harrison, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; RYAN and COLE, Circuit Judges.


COLE, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MARTIN, C. J., joined. RYAN, J. (pp. 762-65), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

COLE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, past and present Memphis police officers, brought an action against the city of Memphis asserting various claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. Plaintiffs currently appeal the district court's dismissal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases