1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 65 F.Supp.2d
  5. 65 F.Supp.2d 872 (1999)
 

U.S. v. CLARO

No. 97-30041.

65 F.Supp.2d 872 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. James CLARO, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division.

August 13, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia A. Tomaw, Patrick D. Hansen, Springfield, IL, for plaintiff.

Michael H. Vonnahmen, Springfield, IL, for defendant.

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.

Is the Wright case right?

A dispute about precedent.

Defendant says positive drug tests don't imply possession.

The Court follows the weight of well-supported authority.

The Defendant is wrong.

This cause is before the Court following the hearing on revocation of supervised release. For the reasons given below, the Court revokes Defendant's supervised release.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases