Since defendant's motion for a trial order of dismissal did not specifically address the sufficiency of the evidence of physical injury, defendant has not preserved this issue and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the victim's subjective expression of pain coupled with objective evidence provided ample evidence of physical injury (see, People v Guidice,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BULLARD
264 A.D.2d 671 (1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 18
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY BULLARD, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 28, 1999.
Decided September 28, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.