Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find unpersuasive the defendant's contention that the physical evidence and identification testimony should have been suppressed on the ground that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle that he was operating. The vehicle matched the registration recovered from the defendant's accomplice in an armed robbery, who already had been apprehended and searched. Moreover, the vehicle was parked in the vicinity...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.