PEOPLE OF NEW YORK v. VERE TONGE


93 N.Y.2d 838 (1999)

710 N.E.2d 653

688 N.Y.S.2d 88

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VERE TONGE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 23, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City (Benjamin C. Gilbert Bair of counsel), Susan J. Abraham and Richard M. Greenberg for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Karen Heiss Eisen of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY and ROSENBLATT concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant's claim that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial because the prosecutor stated in her summation that his conduct fit the "typical behavior of a sex offender" is unpreserved for our review. Defense counsel made only a general objection to the prosecutor's remark at summation; a party's failure to specify the basis for a general objection renders...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases