INTERNATIONAL MARKETING v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND

No. 98-3461.

192 F.3d 724 (1999)

INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY, INC., and Swift-Eckrich, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 23, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Manning (argued), Beaverton, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Leslie D. Locke (argued), Ross & Hardies, Chicago, IL, Chicago, IL, David L. Kabat, Tressler, Soderstrom, Maloney & Priess, Chicago, IL, Jacob B. Tanzer, Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellee Archer-Daniels-Midland Company.

David L. Kabat, Tressler, Soderstrom, Maloney & Priess, Chicago, IL, Gregory R. Mowe, Stoel, Rives, Boley, Jones & Grey, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellee. Swift-Eckrich.

Before COFFEY, RIPPLE, and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.


DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

On August 7, 1997, International Marketing, Limited ("IML") filed a complaint in Oregon state court seeking over $30 million in damages from Archer-Daniels-Midland Company ("ADM") and Swift-Eckrich ("Swift"). Preferring a federal forum and taking advantage of the diversity of citizenship between the parties, ADM and Swift removed the case to federal court. There, on April 10, 1998, a magistrate judge sitting for the District Court for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases