Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances presented, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim (see, Matter of Matarrese v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.