U.S. v. RUDOLPH

No. 97-2053.

190 F.3d 720 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles RUDOLPH, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed September 14, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED and BRIEFED: Timothy M. Holloway, Constitutional Litigation Associates, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant. Jennifer J. Peregord, Office Of The U.S. Attorney, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: David J. Debold, Office Of The U.S. Attorney, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.

Before: KEITH, BOGGS, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Charles Rudolph filed a motion to vacate one of three counts of his conviction. When the district court resentenced Rudolph, it applied a sentence enhancement and it denied his request for a downward departure for his alleged post-sentence rehabilitation. Rudolph appeals, contending that the district court erred by holding that it lacked the discretion to consider his request for the departure, and that the district court committed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases