1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 196 F.3d
  5. 196 F.3d 712 (1999)
 

U.S. v. DE LA ROSA

No. 98-2045.

196 F.3d 712 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben R. DE LA ROSA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 29, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew B. Baker, Jr. (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Dyer, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Sheldon Nagelberg (argued), Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before COFFEY, RIPPLE, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

Ruben De La Rosa ("De La Rosa") filed a pretrial "Motion to Bar Government From Introducing at Trial Substance of Defendant's Post-Arrest Statement Due to a Governmental Violation of FRCrP Rule 16" and argued that the government belatedly disclosed his post-arrest statement in violation of Rule 16(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial judge denied the motion. After a jury found that De La Rosa was guilty of conspiring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases