McDONNELL v. U.S.

No. 98-5383.

180 F.3d 721 (1999)

Michael McDONNELL; Mary McDonnell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided May 27, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas R. Buckner (argued and briefed), Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, Memphis, Tennessee, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Jonathan S. Cohen (briefed), Randolph L. Hutter (argued and briefed), U.S. Department of Justice, Appellate Section, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: SILER and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; BECKWITH, District Judge.


SILER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Michael and Mary McDonnell, husband and wife ("taxpayers"), appeal the district court's dismissal of their tax refund claim. The court determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over their claim for an investment interest deduction because the taxpayers failed to adequately include it in their initial refund claim filed with the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). Because we hold that the interest at issue is nondeductible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases