1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 257 A.D.2d
  5. 257 A.D.2d 639 (1999)
 

PEOPLE v. TANKSLEY

257 A.D.2d 639 (1999)

685 N.Y.S.2d 86

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES TANKSLEY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 19, 1999.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the testimony of Detective Frank Puma improperly bolstered another detective's eyewitness account of the defendant's criminal activity. Detective Puma testified that after he was given a description of the narcotics-related activity and the suspect, he ran to his police car to assist in the chase. This testimony was properly admitted as a necessary explanation of the events...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases