Defendant's motion to suppress his videotaped statement was properly denied. There was no evidence before the hearing court that the police intentionally delayed defendant's arraignment for the purpose of recording a videotaped statement before the indelible right to counsel attached. On the contrary, the delay between the arrest and the arraignment was reasonable for purposes of further investigation and defendant's right to counsel was not violated (see, People v Roberson...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.