U.S. v. HILL

No. 98-4125.

187 F.3d 698 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 9, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ricardo Meza (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Criminal Division, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jerry B. Kurz (argued), Hall & Kurz, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before ESCHBACH, RIPPLE and KANNE, Circuit Judges.


RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

In this direct appeal from his conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), Rodney Hill argues that the evidence was not sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that his actions during the robbery satisfied the intimidation element of the statute. He does not argue that the government failed to prove any other element of its case. Because there was sufficient evidence for a jury to find that the government proved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases