G.A.W. v. D.M.W.

No. C8-98-2422.

596 N.W.2d 284 (1999)

G.A.W., III, Appellant, v. D.M.W., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 28, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel L. Hanson, Briggs and Morgan, Minneapolis, for appellant.

B. Jon Lilleberg, Paul S. Hopewell, Johnson & Condon, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge, HUSPENI, Judge, and NORTON, Judge.


OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant G.A.W. challenges the district court order granting summary judgment to respondent D.M.W. Appellant contends the court erred (1) by determining that res judicata and collateral estoppel barred his tort action, and (2) by determining that his subsequent tort action was against public policy.

FACTS

Appellant and respondent were married in the spring of 1988. Respondent gave birth to two minor children...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases