SELAMAJ v. CITY OF NEW YORK


257 A.D.2d 616 (1999)

684 N.Y.S.2d 559

LOUIS SELAMAJ et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 19, 1999.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that the drastic remedy of striking an answer is inappropriate absent a clear showing that the failure to comply with discovery is willful, contumacious, or in bad faith (see, CPLR 3126; Parish Constr. Corp. v Franlo Tile, 215 A.D.2d 545; Harris v City of New York, 211 A.D.2d 663). In this case, the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases