In re HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
This Document Relates To All Actions.
United States District Court, C.D. Illinois.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 27, 1999.
April 27, 1999.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
H. Laddie Montague, Jr., Charles P. Goodwin, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Robert N. Kaplan, Gregory K. Arenson, Kaplan, Kilsheimer & Fox LLP, New York City, Michael J. Freed, Edit F. Canter, Barat S. McClain, Much Shelist Freed Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C., Chicago, Illinois, for the plaintiff Class.
William F. Martson, Jr., Brian J. Posewitz, David S. Aman, Tonkon Torp LLP, Portland, Oregon, for plaintiff Gray & Company.
Aubrey M. Daniel, III, Steven R. Kuney, Paul Mogin, Williams & Connolly, Washington, D.C., for defendant Archer Daniels Midland Company.
Mark W. Ryan, Robert E. Bloch, Mayer Brown & Platt, Washington, D.C., for defendant Cargill, Incorporated.
Terrence M. Grimm, Joseph Spiegler, Winston & Strawn, Chicago, Illinois, for defendant A.E. Stanley Manufacturing Company.
Donald R. Harris, Edward F. Malone, Jenner & Block, Chicago, Illinois, for defendant American Maize Products Company.
John R. Horan, Oleg Rivkin, Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLP, New York City, for defendants Hubinger Company and Roquette America, Inc.
Terry M. Henry, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for United States Department of Justice.
Jeffrey Cole, Andrew Staes, Cole & Staes, Ltd., Chicago, Illinois, for James R. Randall.
United States District Court, C.D. Illinois.
AMENDED ORDER
MIHM, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Archer Daniels Midland Company's ("ADM") Motion to Quash or, in the Alternative, to Modify Plaintiffs' Subpoena and James R. Randall's ("Randall") Motion to Intervene and to Quash Class Plaintiffs' Subpoena Duces Tecum. For the reasons stated herein, ADM's Motion to Quash is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and Randall's Motion to Intervene and to Quash is GRANTED...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
