FRANKLIN v. JAROS, BAUM & BOLLES, INC.


257 A.D.2d 600 (1999)

684 N.Y.S.2d 282

ARDEN FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. JAROS, BAUM & BOLLES, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 19, 1999.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion (see, Werner v Sun Oil Co., 65 N.Y.2d 839; see also, Meiselman v Crown Hgts. Hosp., 285 N.Y. 389, 398) in precluding the testimony of the plaintiff's proposed expert on the subject of the design, installation, and maintenance of a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system (hereinafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases