1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 72 F.Supp.2d
  5. 72 F.Supp.2d 784 (1999)
 

ARCHER v. ARMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.

No. CIV. 99-40254.

72 F.Supp.2d 784 (1999)

Dennis W. ARCHER, Mayor of the City of Detroit and City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, Plaintiffs, v. ARMS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Beretta USA Corp., B.L. Jennings, Inc., Browning Arms Co., Bryco Arms, Inc., Cobray Firearms, Colt's Manufacturing Company, Inc., Davis Industries, FMJ (a/k/a "Full Metal Jacket"), Glock, Inc., H & R 1871, Inc., MKS Supply, Inc., d/b/a Hipoint Firearms, International Armament Corp., d/b/a Interarms Industries, Inc., KEL-TEC CNC Industries, Inc., Lorcin Engineering Company, Inc., Mossberg & Sons, Inc., Navegar, Inc., d/b/a Intratec USA, Inc., Phoenix Arms, Raven Arms, Inc., Smith & Wesson Corp., Sturm Ruger & Company, Inc., Sundance Industries, Inc., S.W. Daniel, Inc., Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc., Alexander's Sport Shop, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, d/b/a Alexander's Gun Shop and Gun Range, Lloyd Dean V. Parr, d/b/a Dean's Gun Shop II, Dick's Sporting Goods, a Michigan Corporation, Gander Mountain, a Michigan Corporation, Gibraltar Trade Center, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Joel Silber, d/b/a Joel Silber Sporting Goods, Lortz, Ltd., a Michigan Corporation, d/b/a Midwest Ordinance, Motor City Sports Car Ltd., Urbanski's Gun Shop, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, d/b/a Pago's Gun Shop, the Sports Authority, Michigan, a Michigan Corporation, the Sports Authority, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and General Laney d/b/a Laney's Gun and Supplies and General Laney Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

October 14, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. Noseda, Detroit City Law Department, David W. Christensen, Samuel L. Simpson, Charfoos & Christensen, Detroit, MI, for Dennis W. Archer, Mayor of the City of Detroit, City of Detroit, plaintiffs.

Anthony G. Arnone, John P. Hessburg, Ellen C. Pedesky, Kitch, Drutchas, Detroit, MI, for Arms Technology, Inc.

Robert B. Holt, Jr., Secrest, Wardle, Farmington Hills, MI, James C. Sabalos, Newport Beach, CA, for B.L. Jennings, Inc., Bryco Arms, Inc., Defendants.

John P. Hessburg, Kitch, Drutchas, Detroit, MI, for Browning Arms Co., Glock, Inc., H & R 1871, Inc., KEL-TEC, CNC Industries, Inc., Mossberg & Sons, Inc., Defendants.

Gerard V. Mantese, Theresamarie Mantese, Mantese, Miller, Troy, MI, for MKS Supply, Inc. dba Hi-Point Firearms, Defendant.

James C. Sabalos, Newport Beach, CA, for Lorcin Engineering Co, Inc., Defendant.

Michael F. Condit, Condit, McGarry, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Navegar, Inc., dba Intratech USA, Inc., Defendant.

Robert B. Holt, Jr., Secrest, Wardle, Farmington Hills, MI, for Phoenix Arms, Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants.

William S. Noakes, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Smith & Wesson Corp, Sturm Ruger & Co., Inc., Defendants.

Thomas K. DiPietro, DiPietro & Day, Belleville, MI, for Alexander's Sport Shop, Inc. dba Alexander's Gun Shop and gun Range, Defendants.

Mark G. Butler, Center Line, MI, Carmine J. Perrotta, Adams, Perrotta, St. Clair Shores, MI, for Lloyd Dean V. Parr dba Deans Gun Shop II, Defendant.

Timothy O. McMahon, Honigman, Miller, Detroit, MI, Stephen Wasinger, Wasinger, Kickham, Royal Oak, MI, for Gander Mountain, Defendant.

James A. Tucker, Suspended, Tucker, Barbour, Detroit, MI, for Gibraltar Trade Center, Inc., Urbanski's Gun Shop, Inc., Defendants.

David T. Rogers, Draugelis & Ashton, Plymouth, MI, for Joel Silber, dba Joel Silber Sporting Goods, Defendants.

Robert E. Sanders, Punta Gorda, FL, Kathleen M. Kubicki, Detroit, MI, for Lortz, Ltd. dba Midwest Ordnance, Defendant.

Eric S. Handy, Detroit, MI, for General Laney dba Laney's Gun Supplies, Defendant.

John P. Hessburg, Kitch, Drutchas, Eric S. Handy, Detroit, MI, for General Laney, Inc., Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiffs Dennis W. Archer and the City of Detroit. This motion was set for oral argument on November 3, 1999. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), this Court has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid in the disposition of this motion. For the reasons set forth below, this Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases