Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The mere assertion of the appellant that the documents under review were shielded by the attorney-client privilege, or were exempt from disclosure as attorney work product or as material prepared for litigation, did not satisfy its burden of showing that the materials in question were protected from disclosure (see, e.g., People v Osorio,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.