McKAY v. CIANI


267 A.D.2d 581 (1999)

698 N.Y.S.2d 562

CYNTHIA McKAY, Respondent, v. JOSEPH CIANI, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

Decided December 2, 1999.


We agree with the rationale expressed by Supreme Court in determining the motion and add merely that leave to amend is not to be granted where the only merit shown, as here, is that the proposed amendment "flows logically from the facts of [the] case" (Marpe v Dolmetsch, 246 A.D.2d 723, 724).

Ordered that the order is affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases