Ordered that the order of disposition entered December 22, 1997, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court's finding that he violated the terms of his second conditional discharge was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 360.3; see also, Matter of Julies R.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.