ZIMMERMAN v. SAFECO INS. CO. OF AMERICA

No. C9-98-1991.

593 N.W.2d 248 (1999)

Robert ZIMMERMAN, Appellant, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Respondent, Auto-Owners Insurance Company, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted July 28, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew P. Engebretson, St. Paul, for appellant.

Lindsay G. Arthur, Jr., Paula Duggan Vraa, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge, LANSING, Judge, and WILLIS, Judge.


OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Appellant Robert Zimmerman challenges adverse summary judgment, claiming the district court erred in concluding that a homeowner's insurance policy issued to him by respondent Safeco Insurance Companies (Safeco) does not provide coverage for a sexual-harassment claim brought against him by one of his former employees. We affirm.

FACTS

On claims by a former female...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases