STURM v. PROVIDIAN NAT. BANK

No. Civ.A. 5:99-0599.

242 B.R. 599 (1999)

Hazel V. STURM, by Lewis Chester Sturm, her attorney in fact, Plaintiff, v. PROVIDIAN NATIONAL BANK, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division.

December 23, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel F. Hedges, Charleston, WV, for plaintiff.

Daniel Booth, Booth & McCarthy, Bridgeport, WV, for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND REMAND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending are (1) Defendant's motion to reinstate this action to the active docket, (2) Plaintiff's motion to dismiss claim or, in the alternative, to amend the Complaint, and (3) Plaintiff's motion to remand. For reasons discussed more fully below, the Court GRANTS all these motions seriatim.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff alleges that when...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases