1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 555 Pa.
  5. 555 Pa. 285 (1999)
 

ROGERS v. PENNS. BD. OF PROB. AND PAROLE

555 Pa. 285 (1999)

724 A.2d 319

Nathaniel ROGERS, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Appellee. Christopher Reed, Appellant, v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Appellee. Michael K. Meehan, Appellant, v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided January 22, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel C. Stretton, Philadelphia, for Nathaniel Rogers, Christopher Reed, Michael K. Meehan.

Nathaniel Rogers, Pro Se.

Christopher Reed, Pro Se.

Michael K. Meehan, Pro Se.

Arthur R. Thomas, Harrisburg, for PA Bd. Probation/Parole.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

This Court granted allocatur to determine whether a decision by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (hereinafter "Parole Board") to deny an application for parole upon expiration of an inmate's minimum sentence and thereafter is uniquely one of administrative discretion and, as such, is not subject to judicial review.

Nathaniel Rogers, Christopher Reed, and Michael Meehan ("appellants") appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases