1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 88 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 750 (1999)
 

MAXCONN INC. v. TRUCK INS. EXCHANGE

No. H018151.

88 Cal.Rptr.2d 750 (1999)

74 Cal.App.4th 1267

MAXCONN INCORPORATED, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing October 15, 1999.

Review Denied December 15, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goldsberry, Freeman & Swanson, Sacramento, Palmer J. Swanson, for Defendant and Appellant.

Mount & Stoelker, Daniel S. Mount, Alfredo A. Bismonte, San Jose, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P.J.

In this case, we decide whether patent infringement may be considered advertising injury under a commercial general liability (CGL) policy that defines advertising injury as "[i]nfringement of copyright, title or slogan." We conclude that the term infringement of title is a reference to any infringement of a legally protected name, appellation or designation. Hence, patent infringement does not constitute advertising injury as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases