Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's request to cross-examine an undercover police officer regarding the officer's alleged misidentification of individuals in two prior unrelated cases. Whether the officer erroneously described and/or apprehended individuals who were later released had no bearing on the issue of the identity of the defendant in this case. Accordingly, the trial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
