1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 75 F.Supp.2d
  5. 75 F.Supp.2d 761 (1999)
 

HINEY PRINTING CO. v. BRANTNER

No. 5:99-CV-349.

75 F.Supp.2d 761 (1999)

HINEY PRINTING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Jeannine BRANTNER, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

November 17, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daran P. Kiefer, Kreiner & Peters, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff.

Mark C. Willis, Akron, OH, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

GWIN, District Judge.

Defendant Jeannine Brantner and Plaintiff Hiney Printing Company ("Hiney Printing") have filed cross motions for summary judgment in this case arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. [Docs. 29, 34]. In ruling on these motions, the Court decides whether the "make-whole" rule stops Hiney Printing from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases