PHYSICIANS' RECIPROCAL INSURERS v. BLANK


258 A.D.2d 573 (1999)

686 N.Y.S.2d 449

PHYSICIANS' RECIPROCAL INSURERS, Respondent, v. LOUIS A. BLANK, Defendant, and THERESA TURILLI et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided February 16, 1999.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly declared that the plaintiff, Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers (hereinafter PRI), has no duty to defend or indemnify the defendant Louis A. Blank, M.D., in the underlying action. It is undisputed that the injuries alleged in the underlying action grew out of sexual acts between the defendant Theresa Turilli and the defendant Dr. Blank. Since the PRI policy issued to Dr. Blank provides coverage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases