Supreme Court of Connecticut.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 14, 1999.
Officially released December 14, 1999.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Kenneth Rosenthal, special public defender, and Mark Rademacher, assistant public defender, with whom, on the brief, were Karen Goodrow and BarryButler, assistant public defenders, for the appellant in Docket No. 16124, appellee in Docket No. 16135 (defendant).
Michael E. O'Hare, assistant state's attorney, and Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom were Kevin T. Kane, state's attorney, and, on the brief, Susan C. Marks, supervisory assistant state's attorney, for the appellee in Docket No. 16124, appellant in Docket No. 16135 (state).
Norcott, Sullivan, Peters, Callahan and Schaller, JS.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Opinion
PETERS, J.
In State v. Ross,230 Conn. 183, 286, 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165, 115 S.Ct. 1133, 130 L. Ed. 2d 1095 (1995), this court held that, as a result of an improper evidentiary ruling, the defendant, Michael B. Ross, was entitled to a new penalty hearing to determine whether the state was entitled to exact the ultimate penalty of death. The present appeal raises two...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
