Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree since the evidence failed to satisfy that element of Penal Law § 160.15 (4) which requires that a defendant "[d]isplay what appears to be a * * * firearm". This claim is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.