1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 511 S.E.2d
  5. 511 S.E.2d 302 (1999)
 

STATE v. HAYES

No. 311PA98.

511 S.E.2d 302 (1999)

350 N.C. 79

STATE of North Carolina v. John Frances HAYES.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by William P. Hart and Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorneys General, for the State-appellant and -appellee.

Rudolf & Maher, P.A., by M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill; Smith, Helms, Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., by James G. Exum, Jr., Greensboro; and The Exum Law Office, by Mary March Exum, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellant and -appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this case, the Court of Appeals concluded

that if: (1) there has been a full evidentiary hearing where the substance of the objection(s) raised by the motion in limine has been thoroughly explored; (2) the order denying the motion is explicit and definitive; (3) the evidence actually offered at trial is substantially consistent with the evidence explored at the hearing on the motion; and (4) there is no suggestion that the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases