Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner's property was damaged by a storm on December 11-12, 1992. The proofs of loss executed by the petitioner on December 29, 1993, settled all claims against the respondent for storm damage to the property except for damage to piers, docks, and bulkheads. We agree with the Supreme Court that since the petitioner has not made a claim for the alleged storm damage for which it now seeks arbitration, there is...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.