FULMER v. FULMER

No. C6-98-1799.

594 N.W.2d 210 (1999)

In re the Marriage of Don Brian FULMER, petitioner, Appellant, v. Cathy L. FULMER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 18, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth M. Pierce, Messinger, Ojile Pierce, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis (for appellant).

Arthur W. Priesz, Jr., Priesz Law, Minneapolis (for respondent).

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge, KLAPHAKE, Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.


OPINION

HUSPENI,* Judge

Appellant contests the trial court's use of earning capacity and refusal to consider debt incurred in satisfaction of the parties' stipulated property award in calculating spousal maintenance. Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Don Brian Fulmer and respondent Cathy Fulmer were married in 1975...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases