Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court did not err in denying suppression of a handgun seized from his person. The initial encounter between the police and the defendant, who had been identified as the party responsible for a homicide, was no more than a request for information (see, People v Hollman,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.