Daniel MAGANA-PIZANO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 27, 1999.
December 27, 1999.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael Franquinha, Stender & Larkin, Phoenix, Arizona, for the appellant-petitioner.
Hugh G. Mullane, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the appellee-respondent.
Lucas Guttentag, San Francisco, California, for Amicus Curiae, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation.
Lenni B. Benson, New York, New York, for Amici Curiae, Law Professors.
Marc Van Der Hout, and Zachary Nightingale, Van Der Hout & Brigagliano, San Francisco, California, and Nadine Wettstein, Washington, DC, for Amici Curiae, The American Immigration Lawyers Association, and the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild.
Before: GOODWIN and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, PREGERSON, District Judge.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee,525 U.S. 471, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999) ("American-Arab"), decided after the issuance of our prior opinion in this case. See INS v. Magana-Pizano, ___ U.S. ___, 119 S.Ct. 1137, 143 L.Ed.2d 206 (1999). With the guidance of American...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
