PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges his convictions and sentences for five crimes committed in the course of a single criminal episode. We affirm the appellant's convictions, but we vacate the habitual felony offender sentences imposed for these crimes because the trial court committed fundamental error in directing that the sentences be served consecutively.
As the appellee concedes, the appellant's sentences are prohibited by Hale v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.