MALOVEC v. HAMRELL

No. B111152.

82 Cal.Rptr.2d 712 (1999)

70 Cal.App.4th 434

Justin MALOVEC, a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Charles HAMRELL, Defendant and Respondent; Bruce G. Fagel, Objector and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

March 1, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce G. Fagel, in pro. per, and James E. Wright for Objector and Appellant.

O'Flaherty, Cross, Martinez, Ovando & Hatton, Robert M. Dato and Brian P. Barrow, Anaheim, for Defendant and Respondent.


GRIGNON, Acting P.J.

After granting defendant's motion for summary judgment, the trial court on its own motion ordered plaintiffs attorney to show cause why sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.71 should not be imposed for the filing and pursuit of the complaint. Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the complaint. After a hearing, the trial court imposed monetary sanctions against plaintiffs attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases