Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court considered reasonable alternatives to closure of the courtroom during the testimony of the undercover officers and the measures it adopted were narrowly tailored to protect the People's interests in guarding the identities of the undercover officers (see, People v Ramos,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.