1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 82 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 705 (1999)
 

FALL RIVER WILD TROUT v. COUNTY OF SHASTA

No. C028650.

82 Cal.Rptr.2d 705 (1999)

70 Cal.App.4th 482

FALL RIVER WILD TROUT FOUNDATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. COUNTY OF SHASTA et al., Defendants and Appellants; Fall River Ranches, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

February 26, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., Wagstaff & Jellins, Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., Woodside; and Charles E. McClung, Jr., Laguna Beach, for Defendants and Appellants, County of Shasta and County of Shasta Board of Supervisors, and for Real Party in Interest and Appellant, Fall River Ranches.

Law Offices of McHugh & Chen, William D. McHugh and Cammie W. Chen, San Jose, for Plaintiffs and Respondents, Fall River Wild Trout Foundation, Michael Fitzwater, and W.R. Ranches LLC.

CALLAHAN, J.

Plaintiffs Fall River Wild Trout Foundation, Michael Fitzwater, and W.R. Ranches LLC filed a petition for writ of mandate in Shasta County Superior Court.1 They sought to set aside the Shasta County Board of Supervisors' adoption of a mitigated negative declaration and zoning amendment to permit development along Fall River by real party in interest Fall River Ranches. Shasta County and its Board of Supervisors (collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases