Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claims that his statements to law enforcement authorities were obtained under duress, that his Miranda rights were improperly administered, and that the interviewing police officer improperly amended his written statement were not supported by any factual evidence. His claims were contradicted by the testimony of the police officer, which created a question of credibility for the hearing court, whose findings...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
