SHAOLAIN v. SAFECO INS. CO.

No. B118385.

83 Cal.Rptr.2d 702 (1999)

71 Cal.App.4th 268

Mansour SHAOLIAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

Rehearing Denied May 5, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wasserman, Comden & Casselman and Gary S. Soter, Tarzana, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

LaTorraca and Goettsch, Raymond H. Goettsch and Teresa Cho, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.


GODOY PEREZ, J.

Plaintiff Mehdi Sina-Khadiv and plaintiffs Mansour Shaolian and Rahel Shaolian, both in their individual capacities and as successors in interest to Ramtin Shaolian, appeal from the order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrers of defendant Safeco Insurance Company and the concomitant order dismissing the first amended complaint as to Safeco. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On the night...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases