1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 49 F.Supp.2d
  5. 49 F.Supp.2d 728 (1999)
 

RODIN PROPERTIES-SHORE v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.

No. CIV. A. 95-6541 (SSB).

49 F.Supp.2d 728 (1999)

RODIN PROPERTIES-SHORE MALL, N.V., Plaintiff, v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., and Neal Rodin, Defendants. Neal Rodin, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., ABN AMRO Holding, N.V., Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Voor De Metaalindustrie, Stichting Pensioenfonds Rabobankorganisatie, Amev Levensverzekering, N.V., and Centraal Beheer Pensioenverzekering, N.V., Third-Party Defendants. Neal Rodin, Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Rodin Properties-Shore Mall, N.V., Counterclaim Defendant. Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc., and Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Crossclaim Plaintiffs, v. Neal Rodin, Crossclaim Defendant. Cushman & Wakefield Of Pennsylvania, Inc., and Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Shore Mall Associates, L.P., R.K. Realty, Two Associates, L.P., Leo Ullman, and Reid & Priest LLP, Third-Party Defendants. Shore Mall Associates, L.P., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant. Shore Mall Associates, L.P., Crossclaim Plaintiff, v. ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., ABN AMRO Holding, N.V., Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Voor De Metaalindustrie, Stichting Pensioenfonds Rabobankorganisatie, Amev Levensverzekering, N.V., and Centraal Beheer Pensioenverzekering, N.V., Crossclaim Defendants. Shore Mall Associates, L.P., Rule 14(a) Plaintiff, v. Rodin Properties-Shore Mall, N.V., Rule 14(a) Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

May 5, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark McMenamy, Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C., Morristown, NJ, and Robert C. Sentner, Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, New York City, for Plaintiff Rodin Properties-Shore Mall, N.V.

Thomas D. Ruane, St. John & Wayne, L.L.C., East Newark, NJ, for Defendant Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.

Cozen & O'Connor, Newark, NJ, and Michael Minsker, Charlotte, NC, for Defendant Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.

Diana Vondra Carrig, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz LLP, Cherry Hill, NJ, and Barbara W. Mather, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant Neal Rodin.

Frederick Lee Whitmer, Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, Morristown, NJ, for Third-Party Defendants ABN AMBRO Bank, N.V., ABN AMBRO Holding, N.V., Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Voor De Metaalindustrie, Stichting Pensioenfonds Rabobankorganisatie, Amev Levensverzekering, N.V., Centaal Beheer Pensioenverzekering, N.V.

Barbara Mather, Pepper Hamilton & Scheetz LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Third-Party Defendant Shore Mall Associates, L.P.

OPINION ON CHOICE-OF-LAW ISSUES ARISING OUT OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS

OPINION ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

BROTMAN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the following motions: (1) motion of Rodin Properties-Shore Mall, N.V. ("N.V.") and N.V.'s shareholders, specifically Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Voor De Metaalindustrie, Stichting Pensioenfonds Rabobankorganisatie, Amev Levensverzekering N.V., and Centraal Beheer Pensioenverzekering N.V. (collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases