STATE EX REL. DRUGGAN v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 96-2395.

85 Ohio St.3d 680 (1999)

THE STATE EX REL. DRUGGAN, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE; KINNEAR DIVISION, HARSCO CORPORATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 23, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Karl J. Sutter, for appellee and cross-appellant.


Per Curiam.

One question is before us: Did the commission abuse its discretion in ordering claimant to submit to a medical examination on the issue of ongoing TENS treatment? Upon review, we find that it did not.

R.C. 4123.651(A) states:

"The employer of a claimant who is injured or disabled in the course of his employment may require, without the approval of the administrator or the industrial commission, that the claimant be examined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases