1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 32 F.Supp.2d
  5. 32 F.Supp.2d 44 (1999)
 

LENOX v. UNISYS CORP.

No. 3:98-CV-00537 (WWE).

32 F.Supp.2d 44 (1999)

Francis W. LENOX, Plaintiff, v. UNISYS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

January 6, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan M. Cane, Fairfield, CT, Francis W. Lenox, Trumbull, CT, for Plaintiff.

Diane K. Rembleske, Christine P. Shields, Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler & Krupman, Stamford, CT, for Defendant.

RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Unisys Corporation ("UC") moves this Court for an order dismissing plaintiff Francis Lenox's ("Lenox") complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). In the alternative, UC moves for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule 56. In his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases