1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 180 F.3d
  5. 180 F.3d 583 (1999)
 

SCHEDULED AIRLINES TRAFFIC OFFICES v. OBJECTIVE

No. 97-2713.

180 F.3d 583 (1999)

SCHEDULED AIRLINES TRAFFIC OFFICES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OBJECTIVE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 14, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Robert Matthew Beckman, BODE & BECKMAN, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Jonathan S. Feld, BRAND, LOWELL & RYAN, PC., Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Sheri M. Lyons, Daniel S. Heyneman, Jacquelyn Gluck, BODE & BECKMAN, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Ross A. Nabatoff, BRAND, LOWELL & RYAN, PC., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge HAMILTON joined.

OPINION

MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:

Scheduled Airlines Traffic Offices, Inc. ("SATO") and Objective: Inc. ("Objective") agreed to produce a travel software system together. After Objective ceased work on the project, SATO filed a complaint for breach of contract and breach of warranty against Objective. Objective filed an answer and six...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases