1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 83 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 677 (1999)
 

SIPPLE v. FOUNDATION FOR NAT. PROGRESS

No. B120358.

83 Cal.Rptr.2d 677 (1999)

71 Cal.App.4th 226

Donald SIPPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FOUNDATION FOR NATIONAL PROGRESS et al. Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

Review Denied July 28, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bostwick & Hoffman and Gary L. Bostwick, Paul L. Hoffman, Santa Monica, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Kent L. Richland, Michael D. Fitts and Edward L. Xanders, Beverly Hills, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Skjerven, Morrill, MacPherson, Franklin & Friel, San Francisco, Edward P. Davis, Jr. and James M. Chadwick for Defendants and Respondents.

NOTT, J.

Appellant Donald Sipple appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court dismissed his complaint in favor of respondents Foundation for National Progress, d.b.a. "Mother Jones," and Richard Blow (hereinafter sometimes referred to individually, or collectively as respondents). In this appeal we determine whether an article published by Mother Jones was privileged under Civil Code section 47, subdivision (d), therefore subjecting appellant's defamation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases