Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Upon our review of the record, we agree with the Supreme Court that the denial of the petitioner's application was arbitrary and capricious. The proposed day-care center is a permitted accessory use to the principal use of the petitioner's property (see, Matter of Siegert v Luney,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.