Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The complainant's identification of the appellant from a photographic array was not unduly suggestive merely because the detective had previously informed the complainant that a suspect was in custody (cf., People v Mack,
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency, we find that it was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.