Timothy DAVIS, et al., Respondents,
v.
MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING CO., Respondent,
E.D. Bullard Company, Respondent,
Ruemelin Company, defendant and third-party plaintiff, Respondent,
Badger Mining Corporation, defendant and third-party plaintiff, Respondent,
U.S. Silica Company, et al., defendants and third-party plaintiffs, Respondents,
Unimin Corporation, et al., Defendants, and
Fairmount Minerals, Ltd., et al., defendants and third-party plaintiffs, Respondents,
Wedron Silica Company, defendant and third-party plaintiff, Respondent,
v.
Chicago Bridge and Iron Company, an Illinois Corporation, et al., Third-Party Defendants,
CBI Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, third-party defendant, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 23, 1999.
March 23, 1999.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael S. Polk, Michael R. Strom, Sieben Polk LaVerdiere Jones & Hawn, P.A., Hastings, MN (for respondents Timothy and Pamela Davis)
Tyrone P. Bujold, Mullen J. Dowdal, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN; and Lawrence R. King, King & Hatch, St. Paul, MN (for respondent Minnesota Mining)
Mark J. Peschel, Johnson & Lindberg, Minneapolis, MN (for respondent E.D. Bullard)
Jerome B. Abrams, Bradford J. Roegge, Abrams & Smith, P.A., Minneapolis, MN (for respondent Badger Mining)
Robert Miller, David N. Lutz, Bowman & Brooke, Minneapolis, MN (for respondents U.S. Silica and South Jersey Industries)
Charles H. Becker, Meagher & Geer, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN (for respondents Fairmont Minerals and Wedron Silica)
Blake Shepard, Jr., Susan M. Humiston, Leonard, Street and Deinard, P.A., Minneapolis, MN (for respondent Wedron Silica)
Robert W. Kettering, Joseph W. Waller, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, MN (for appellant CBI Industries)
Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge, DAVIES, Judge, and WILLIS, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge
CBI Industries, Inc. appeals from the district court's denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, claiming it has no ties to Minnesota. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Timothy Davis, the plaintiff in the underlying action, worked in the sandblasting/painting and construction business. He began working for Chicago Bridge and Iron Company in 1976 and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
